AI is spiritual warfare
AI is spiritual warfare
I am so sick of the prase "well its coming so we better start using it now."
Work already had barely any meaning. As automation has increased over the last century, so has beurocracy, to keep us all running on the treadmill (because free time = lost profits and eventual revolution).
And now, we're supposed to use AI to generate documents, and then use AI to summarise the documents back to us, but then always double check everything because AI is so unreliable. I wrote a dicument/process that i was actually a bit proud of (despire the process itself being largely beurocracy for the sake of beurocracy) and once complete I was told to put it through an AI to take the human tone out of it and make it blander.
The idea of proof reading a robot's reinterpretation of my work, that will then be read by other robots, makes me want to break down and cry. I could be growing food, or fixing things, or taking care of people. But i need the flexibility and income that a "real" job offers, so i can take care of the kids i am seperated from all day.
The only thing we were permitted to make is paperwork, and now theyre even taking that from us. Keeping our bodies hostage 8+hrs a day while they starve our souls.
Capitalism is a hell and AI is one of the demons torturing us.
I know this isnt really related to women and feminism but i needed to vent to some people who arent distracted by the shinyiness of the new toy.
Quote:In a statement to the Journal, representatives from the PAC decried a “vast force out there that’s looking to slow down AI deployment, prevent the American worker from benefiting from the U.S. leading in global innovation and job creation, and erect a patchwork of regulation.” Leading the Future, they said, “is going to be the counterforce going into next year.”
https://sfstandard.com/2025/09/02/openai-sam-altman-elon-musk-ai-regulation/
Quote:In a statement to the Journal, representatives from the PAC decried a “vast force out there that’s looking to slow down AI deployment, prevent the American worker from benefiting from the U.S. leading in global innovation and job creation, and erect a patchwork of regulation.” Leading the Future, they said, “is going to be the counterforce going into next year.”
Quote:Marx did not believe in the elimination of most physical labor through technological advancements alone in a capitalist society, because he believed capitalism contained within it certain tendencies which countered increasing automation and prevented it from developing beyond a limited point, so that manual industrial labor could not be eliminated until the overthrow of capitalism. Some commentators on Marx have argued that at the time he wrote the Grundrisse, he thought that the collapse of capitalism due to advancing automation was inevitable despite these counter-tendencies, but that by the time of his major work Capital: Critique of Political Economy he had abandoned this view, and came to believe that capitalism could continually renew itself unless overthrown.
The reason I'm not "anti-AI" as a concept is because I actually believe automation and industrialization is essential post-capitalism to improve our working conditions and achieving a post scarcity economy https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Post-scarcity - and AI would fit into that well. But I am fully aware that under capitalism, automation and capitalism does not mix because capitalists will use automation to replace workers as part of the class war.
Quote:Marx did not believe in the elimination of most physical labor through technological advancements alone in a capitalist society, because he believed capitalism contained within it certain tendencies which countered increasing automation and prevented it from developing beyond a limited point, so that manual industrial labor could not be eliminated until the overthrow of capitalism. Some commentators on Marx have argued that at the time he wrote the Grundrisse, he thought that the collapse of capitalism due to advancing automation was inevitable despite these counter-tendencies, but that by the time of his major work Capital: Critique of Political Economy he had abandoned this view, and came to believe that capitalism could continually renew itself unless overthrown.