clovenhooves Feminist Repository Personal Archives The Unicorn Manifesto (archiving my Ovarit self-posts)

The Unicorn Manifesto (archiving my Ovarit self-posts)

The Unicorn Manifesto (archiving my Ovarit self-posts)

 
Pages (6): Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Clover
Kozlik's regular account πŸ€πŸ
902
Apr 13 2025, 11:01 PM
#41
https://ovarit.com/o/WomensLiberation/474311/nordic-model-for-pornography-and-surrogacy

Nordic Model for pornography and surrogacy?
Posted on Sep 23, 2023

The Nordic Model is is focused on prostitution. The key points are to decriminalize carrying out prostitution (selling one's own body), criminalize buying (Johns) and third-party sellers (pimps and brothel owners), and provide education and safe ways out for prostitutes. This works because women are not at risk for getting in trouble with the law, it discourages men from selling women or buying women, and prostituted women have legal protections. The Nordic model also keeps women's bodily autonomy in consideration β€” if a woman truly wants to sell her body, she has the right to do so.

Has there been any discussion about using the Nordic Model for women in pornography and women who are surrogates?

Pornography seems like it fit the Nordic Model pretty well β€” pornography is prostitution on tape. I guess this would make pornography illegal? Which would probably be a big jump for a pornsick society.

I think paid surrogacy would also fit the Nordic Model pretty well β€” it is the selling of women's organs. Altruistic surrogacy is more questionable, but I assume the Nordic Model would give women who are performing an altruistic surrogacy more legal protections as well.

What are everyone's thoughts on applying the Nordic Model to pornography and surrogacy in order to give women protections while preserving bodily autonomy?

Kozlik's regular member account. πŸ€πŸ
Clover
Kozlik's regular account πŸ€πŸ
Apr 13 2025, 11:01 PM #41

https://ovarit.com/o/WomensLiberation/474311/nordic-model-for-pornography-and-surrogacy

Nordic Model for pornography and surrogacy?
Posted on Sep 23, 2023

The Nordic Model is is focused on prostitution. The key points are to decriminalize carrying out prostitution (selling one's own body), criminalize buying (Johns) and third-party sellers (pimps and brothel owners), and provide education and safe ways out for prostitutes. This works because women are not at risk for getting in trouble with the law, it discourages men from selling women or buying women, and prostituted women have legal protections. The Nordic model also keeps women's bodily autonomy in consideration β€” if a woman truly wants to sell her body, she has the right to do so.

Has there been any discussion about using the Nordic Model for women in pornography and women who are surrogates?

Pornography seems like it fit the Nordic Model pretty well β€” pornography is prostitution on tape. I guess this would make pornography illegal? Which would probably be a big jump for a pornsick society.

I think paid surrogacy would also fit the Nordic Model pretty well β€” it is the selling of women's organs. Altruistic surrogacy is more questionable, but I assume the Nordic Model would give women who are performing an altruistic surrogacy more legal protections as well.

What are everyone's thoughts on applying the Nordic Model to pornography and surrogacy in order to give women protections while preserving bodily autonomy?


Kozlik's regular member account. πŸ€πŸ

Clover
Kozlik's regular account πŸ€πŸ
902
Apr 13 2025, 11:02 PM
#42
https://ovarit.com/o/WomensLiberation/467417/woman-s-rights-vs-human-rights-a-semantical-discussion

"Woman's" rights vs "human" rights: a semantical discussion
Posted on Sep 15, 2023

I was thinking about the difference in how we label the rights of women versus the rights of humans. The rights of women are defined as "women's rights," while the rights of humans are defined as "human rights."

I wonder why we don't use the word "woman rights."

See, when we call it "women's rights" with an apostrophe, it implies the possessive rights of women. Of course women can possess rights. However, what one possesses can be taken away.

With the word "human rights," the rights of the human and the human themselves are one. One cannot take human rights without taking away the human. Human rights appear innate to humans.

It seems to me that the semantical difference is that human rights cannot be stolen. Meanwhile women's rights can, and we can see today are, being taken from women. But I would argue since women's rights are human rights, then woman rights are innate to women. They are not merely a possessive, they are a part of women.

What do you all think of the semantics of these terms? Maybe somebody with a better grasp on English grammar could correct me if I am thinking about these semantics incorrectly.

Kozlik's regular member account. πŸ€πŸ
Clover
Kozlik's regular account πŸ€πŸ
Apr 13 2025, 11:02 PM #42

https://ovarit.com/o/WomensLiberation/467417/woman-s-rights-vs-human-rights-a-semantical-discussion

"Woman's" rights vs "human" rights: a semantical discussion
Posted on Sep 15, 2023

I was thinking about the difference in how we label the rights of women versus the rights of humans. The rights of women are defined as "women's rights," while the rights of humans are defined as "human rights."

I wonder why we don't use the word "woman rights."

See, when we call it "women's rights" with an apostrophe, it implies the possessive rights of women. Of course women can possess rights. However, what one possesses can be taken away.

With the word "human rights," the rights of the human and the human themselves are one. One cannot take human rights without taking away the human. Human rights appear innate to humans.

It seems to me that the semantical difference is that human rights cannot be stolen. Meanwhile women's rights can, and we can see today are, being taken from women. But I would argue since women's rights are human rights, then woman rights are innate to women. They are not merely a possessive, they are a part of women.

What do you all think of the semantics of these terms? Maybe somebody with a better grasp on English grammar could correct me if I am thinking about these semantics incorrectly.


Kozlik's regular member account. πŸ€πŸ

Clover
Kozlik's regular account πŸ€πŸ
902
Apr 13 2025, 11:03 PM
#43
https://ovarit.com/o/WomensLiberation/461013/i-made-kindrad-org

I made kindrad.org!
Posted on Sep 8, 2023

kindrad.org
Hello all! I wanted to share the website that I've created, kindrad.org. My goal was to create a place where a person with little background in feminism or gender criticism would be able to get started in understanding these concepts.

Some time ago, I asked questions on Ovarit about what are some things you wish you could tell people about radical feminism or being gender critical. I tried to take into account as much of those discussions as I could while developing this website. I wanted radical feminist and gender critical views to be clear and understandable.

I hope that this is a website that can be easily linked to and shared among people to help them get started in understanding what radical feminist and gender critical views are. I'm tired of seeing these views misunderstood at best or purposefully misinterpreted and "boogeyman"ed at worst. I wanted to make many concepts and notions clear; sunlight is the best disinfectant.

Free kindrad.org stickers!
I created stickers for this website to share radical feminism and gender criticism with the world! Do you want free kindrad stickers? If so, let me know what your favorite stickers are and I'll send you some! Choose up to three stickers! Offer available in United States only.

Here are what the stickers look like: https://i.imgur.com/tTzUt3L.jpg

A full list of phrases is available on the stickers page.

[Disclaimer: I am an internet stranger. Be careful with who you give your mailing address to. For my own safety, I am sending stickers without a return address on the envelope, so if you don't receive your stickers, it may have been because they got lost in the mail system and couldn't be returned to sender (me). Request stickers at your own risk!]

Articles section
I have a subdomain, articles.kindrad.org; It currently has a lot of public domain feminist literature, and one article republished with permission from Dr. Tannen. If anyone has any public domain feminist literature they would like me to host on my website, I would be happy to do so. Additionally, if you know of any living authors who would give me permission to republish their feminist or gender critical articles on my website, I would be happy to learn about those as well.

Future plans
In the future, I would like to add subdomains for both radical feminism and gender criticism. In these subdomains, I would go into greater detail on both these topics. For radical feminism, I could go further into its intersectionality, criticize beauty culture, and explain in detail how prostitution and pornography harm women. For gender criticism, I can dissect the manipulation, abuse, propaganda, and logical fallacies that proponents of transgenderism use to further gender ideology. I welcome any collaborative efforts to help flesh out these subdomains.

Thank you!
I want to thank all the wonderful women who have given me advice and suggestions to help improve the website. πŸ’•

I welcome suggestions or constructive criticism! I try to take everything into account, even if I may not implement every single suggestion. I still note them all down and keep them in mind. I appreciate getting many perspectives.



Some optional discussion questions, if anyone is interested:

  • Would you share this website with someone who is confused about what it means to be gender critical? Why or why not?
  • Would you share this website with someone who doesn't know about or misunderstands radical feminism? Why or why not?
  • Is there something this website is missing that you wish it had?
  • Is there something on this website that is confusing?
  • Is there something on this website that would benefit from more elaboration?
πŸ’œπŸ€πŸ’š

Kozlik's regular member account. πŸ€πŸ
Clover
Kozlik's regular account πŸ€πŸ
Apr 13 2025, 11:03 PM #43

https://ovarit.com/o/WomensLiberation/461013/i-made-kindrad-org

I made kindrad.org!
Posted on Sep 8, 2023

kindrad.org
Hello all! I wanted to share the website that I've created, kindrad.org. My goal was to create a place where a person with little background in feminism or gender criticism would be able to get started in understanding these concepts.

Some time ago, I asked questions on Ovarit about what are some things you wish you could tell people about radical feminism or being gender critical. I tried to take into account as much of those discussions as I could while developing this website. I wanted radical feminist and gender critical views to be clear and understandable.

I hope that this is a website that can be easily linked to and shared among people to help them get started in understanding what radical feminist and gender critical views are. I'm tired of seeing these views misunderstood at best or purposefully misinterpreted and "boogeyman"ed at worst. I wanted to make many concepts and notions clear; sunlight is the best disinfectant.

Free kindrad.org stickers!
I created stickers for this website to share radical feminism and gender criticism with the world! Do you want free kindrad stickers? If so, let me know what your favorite stickers are and I'll send you some! Choose up to three stickers! Offer available in United States only.

Here are what the stickers look like: https://i.imgur.com/tTzUt3L.jpg

A full list of phrases is available on the stickers page.

[Disclaimer: I am an internet stranger. Be careful with who you give your mailing address to. For my own safety, I am sending stickers without a return address on the envelope, so if you don't receive your stickers, it may have been because they got lost in the mail system and couldn't be returned to sender (me). Request stickers at your own risk!]

Articles section
I have a subdomain, articles.kindrad.org; It currently has a lot of public domain feminist literature, and one article republished with permission from Dr. Tannen. If anyone has any public domain feminist literature they would like me to host on my website, I would be happy to do so. Additionally, if you know of any living authors who would give me permission to republish their feminist or gender critical articles on my website, I would be happy to learn about those as well.

Future plans
In the future, I would like to add subdomains for both radical feminism and gender criticism. In these subdomains, I would go into greater detail on both these topics. For radical feminism, I could go further into its intersectionality, criticize beauty culture, and explain in detail how prostitution and pornography harm women. For gender criticism, I can dissect the manipulation, abuse, propaganda, and logical fallacies that proponents of transgenderism use to further gender ideology. I welcome any collaborative efforts to help flesh out these subdomains.

Thank you!
I want to thank all the wonderful women who have given me advice and suggestions to help improve the website. πŸ’•

I welcome suggestions or constructive criticism! I try to take everything into account, even if I may not implement every single suggestion. I still note them all down and keep them in mind. I appreciate getting many perspectives.



Some optional discussion questions, if anyone is interested:

  • Would you share this website with someone who is confused about what it means to be gender critical? Why or why not?
  • Would you share this website with someone who doesn't know about or misunderstands radical feminism? Why or why not?
  • Is there something this website is missing that you wish it had?
  • Is there something on this website that is confusing?
  • Is there something on this website that would benefit from more elaboration?
πŸ’œπŸ€πŸ’š


Kozlik's regular member account. πŸ€πŸ

Clover
Kozlik's regular account πŸ€πŸ
902
Apr 13 2025, 11:05 PM
#44
https://ovarit.com/o/GenderCritical/446163/humanizing-alternatives-to-tif-tim

Humanizing alternatives to TIF/TIM?
Posted on Aug 22, 2023

I was reading about dehumanization in Brene Brown's Atlas of the Heart. I thought about the terms Transgender-Identifying-Female and Transgender-Identifying-Male. I thought about how incel men call women "females." Many women have pointed out how dehumanizing it is to have their sex used as a noun.

I wonder if Transgender-Identifying Woman and Transgender-Identifying Man would be more respectful and humanizing?

I understand there may be some issue with people saying "woman is now a meaningless term that can include transwomen." I think it would be clear by the fact gender critical people use TIM/TIW that woman means adult human female and man means adult human male. Still, I could see how these terms can be manipulated by TRAs to imply TIW = "transwoman" when it is intended to mean a natal woman who identifies as trans.

My objective is to bring back some humanity. While I don't agree with gender ideology, I don't want to dehumanize transgender-identifying people.

What are some other possible acronyms that can be used instead of TIF/TIM?

Some ideas:
  • TIW, TIM
    Β  - Transgender-Identifying Woman, Transgender-Identifying Man
    Β  - Cons: can be manipulated by TRAs
  • GNCW, GNCM
    Β  - Gender non-conforming woman, gender non-conforming man
    Β  - Cons: doesn't point out they follow transgenderism
  • WITM, MITW
    Β  - Woman Identifying as Trans Man, Man Identifying as Trans Woman
    Β  - Thanks to @RuneOwl for mentioning this one in this post yesterday!
  • WIM, MIW
    Β  - Woman Identifying as Man, Man Identifying as Woman
I understand this is all semantics, but I do care about ensuring I am not dehumanizing people. I do not hate transgender-identifying people or wish them harm, and I also do not believe in transgenderism. I want to make sure there isn't a way I could respectfully and relatively easily refer to transgender-identifying people without having to resort to using sex as a noun.

Currently, WIM/MIW or WITM/MITW are my top favorites that I might use in gender discourse.

Kozlik's regular member account. πŸ€πŸ
Clover
Kozlik's regular account πŸ€πŸ
Apr 13 2025, 11:05 PM #44

https://ovarit.com/o/GenderCritical/446163/humanizing-alternatives-to-tif-tim

Humanizing alternatives to TIF/TIM?
Posted on Aug 22, 2023

I was reading about dehumanization in Brene Brown's Atlas of the Heart. I thought about the terms Transgender-Identifying-Female and Transgender-Identifying-Male. I thought about how incel men call women "females." Many women have pointed out how dehumanizing it is to have their sex used as a noun.

I wonder if Transgender-Identifying Woman and Transgender-Identifying Man would be more respectful and humanizing?

I understand there may be some issue with people saying "woman is now a meaningless term that can include transwomen." I think it would be clear by the fact gender critical people use TIM/TIW that woman means adult human female and man means adult human male. Still, I could see how these terms can be manipulated by TRAs to imply TIW = "transwoman" when it is intended to mean a natal woman who identifies as trans.

My objective is to bring back some humanity. While I don't agree with gender ideology, I don't want to dehumanize transgender-identifying people.

What are some other possible acronyms that can be used instead of TIF/TIM?

Some ideas:

  • TIW, TIM
    Β  - Transgender-Identifying Woman, Transgender-Identifying Man
    Β  - Cons: can be manipulated by TRAs
  • GNCW, GNCM
    Β  - Gender non-conforming woman, gender non-conforming man
    Β  - Cons: doesn't point out they follow transgenderism
  • WITM, MITW
    Β  - Woman Identifying as Trans Man, Man Identifying as Trans Woman
    Β  - Thanks to @RuneOwl for mentioning this one in this post yesterday!
  • WIM, MIW
    Β  - Woman Identifying as Man, Man Identifying as Woman
I understand this is all semantics, but I do care about ensuring I am not dehumanizing people. I do not hate transgender-identifying people or wish them harm, and I also do not believe in transgenderism. I want to make sure there isn't a way I could respectfully and relatively easily refer to transgender-identifying people without having to resort to using sex as a noun.

Currently, WIM/MIW or WITM/MITW are my top favorites that I might use in gender discourse.


Kozlik's regular member account. πŸ€πŸ

Clover
Kozlik's regular account πŸ€πŸ
902
Apr 13 2025, 11:08 PM
#45
https://ovarit.com/o/WomensLiberation/440816/i-made-a-radical-feminist-and-gender-critical-website-could-i-get-some-input

I made a radical feminist and gender critical website, could I get some input?
Posted on Aug 15, 2023

I wanted to make a website that helps clarify radical feminist and gender critical views. My goal was to make it so a common person with little background in feminism or gender criticality would be able to understand these concepts. I am then going to put this website on stickers and share with the world.

On my website, I have an introductory page, a definitions page, a FAQ page, and a further resources page.

Since Ovarit has around 200,000 visitors a month, I'm a bit hesitant to share it publicly on Ovarit right now. I was hoping to get some volunteers to check out the website and give me any suggestions or comments on anything I could improve, whether it be adding more definitions, clarifying definitions, adding more questions or improving answers to questions, adding more resources, or organizing the website contents better.

If anyone is interested in helping me out, let me know by either commenting below or sending me a private message, I'll send a private message to you with a link to my website. Thank you!

Kozlik's regular member account. πŸ€πŸ
Clover
Kozlik's regular account πŸ€πŸ
Apr 13 2025, 11:08 PM #45

https://ovarit.com/o/WomensLiberation/440816/i-made-a-radical-feminist-and-gender-critical-website-could-i-get-some-input

I made a radical feminist and gender critical website, could I get some input?
Posted on Aug 15, 2023

I wanted to make a website that helps clarify radical feminist and gender critical views. My goal was to make it so a common person with little background in feminism or gender criticality would be able to understand these concepts. I am then going to put this website on stickers and share with the world.

On my website, I have an introductory page, a definitions page, a FAQ page, and a further resources page.

Since Ovarit has around 200,000 visitors a month, I'm a bit hesitant to share it publicly on Ovarit right now. I was hoping to get some volunteers to check out the website and give me any suggestions or comments on anything I could improve, whether it be adding more definitions, clarifying definitions, adding more questions or improving answers to questions, adding more resources, or organizing the website contents better.

If anyone is interested in helping me out, let me know by either commenting below or sending me a private message, I'll send a private message to you with a link to my website. Thank you!


Kozlik's regular member account. πŸ€πŸ

Clover
Kozlik's regular account πŸ€πŸ
902
Apr 13 2025, 11:08 PM
#46
https://ovarit.com/o/FeministBooks/431905/deciding-between-bell-hooks-all-about-love-new-visions-or-the-will-to-change-men

Deciding between bell hooks' "All About Love: New Visions" or "The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love"
Posted on Aug 3, 2023

All About Love is from 2000 and seems focused on the general topic of love. I'm interested in it because I always wonder what "love" really means.

The Will to Change is from 2004 and seems focused more on men and how patriarchy deprives them from being able to love. I initially was interested in this book because of an opinion piece that compared this bell hooks' book to Ken in the Barbie movie. But I'm curious if it's more aimed at men than it is for women?

I'm most likely going to read both at some point, but I'm wondering which to read first. Has anyone read both and might have an opinion on the differences between the two books?

Kozlik's regular member account. πŸ€πŸ
Clover
Kozlik's regular account πŸ€πŸ
Apr 13 2025, 11:08 PM #46

https://ovarit.com/o/FeministBooks/431905/deciding-between-bell-hooks-all-about-love-new-visions-or-the-will-to-change-men

Deciding between bell hooks' "All About Love: New Visions" or "The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love"
Posted on Aug 3, 2023

All About Love is from 2000 and seems focused on the general topic of love. I'm interested in it because I always wonder what "love" really means.

The Will to Change is from 2004 and seems focused more on men and how patriarchy deprives them from being able to love. I initially was interested in this book because of an opinion piece that compared this bell hooks' book to Ken in the Barbie movie. But I'm curious if it's more aimed at men than it is for women?

I'm most likely going to read both at some point, but I'm wondering which to read first. Has anyone read both and might have an opinion on the differences between the two books?


Kozlik's regular member account. πŸ€πŸ

Clover
Kozlik's regular account πŸ€πŸ
902
Apr 13 2025, 11:09 PM
#47
https://ovarit.com/o/Movies/431641/i-shamelessly-loved-barbie-2023

I shamelessly loved Barbie (2023)
Posted on Aug 3, 2023

Let me clarify some points before I continue with my thoughts and feelings on Barbie for the rest of my post. By virtue of us being members of Ovarit, we are likely more "well-versed" in notions of patriarchal systems and societal misogyny than the average woman or movie-goer. If you are going into this movie expecting to learn something new, you most likely won't; you likely already know much of what there is to know about feminism and patriarchy. I recommend tempering any expectations of the movie being a flawless feminist manifesto; despite being about what it means to be a woman in a patriarchal world, Barbie is also meant to be a fun summer blockbuster that needed to appeal to a wide audience. Nevertheless, I still greatly enjoyed this movie.

Weeks ago, I originally stated that I fully acknowledged the movie would be "a saccharine-sweet libfem fever dream," but it honestly was better than I expected. Of course, the movie still had stereotypical flaws that radfems can easily point outβ€”the women still primarily all wore makeup, the patriarchal systems in the movie were objectively worse than Barbie Land's matriarchy, and other "subtle" and "for granted" expectations that women are expected to do are featured in the movie and not addressed. However, despite some misogynistic expectations and some liberal feminist cognitive dissonances, the Barbie movie still hit me hard.

Overall, I feel like the Barbie movie guides the viewer through experiencing the daunting existential crisis that women face when they realize they exist within a misogynistic and patriarchal world.

And putting the feminist focus aside for a brief moment, I felt that Barbie was a great movie with lovingly crafted sets, dazzling dance choreography, densely packed humor and wit, beautiful heartfelt moments about understanding what it means to be human, and an original soundtrack with a diverse emotional palette.

Movie spoilers start below.



The Childlike Innocence of Barbie Land
Before Barbie, the primary dolls available to young girls were baby dolls, essentially suggesting to girls their only societally-approved pretend-play was to prepare them for becoming a mother and nothing more. Ruth, the creator of Barbie, created Barbie in an attempt to let girls know they are more than just "to-be mothers," girls and women can "be anything."

In "Barbie Land," everything is "perfect;" it is very much a bubblegum-pink, saccharine-sweet, childish perception of life. Barbie Land is quite literally depicted as a childlike and idealistic artificial land. Children are innocent and full of hope and possibilities; they do believe Barbie can be anything! That is why Barbie Land is so bubbly and hopeful, because it's a physical manifestation of bunch of little girls playing with dolls and pouring their happiness and wonder into a positive pretend world. The movie even pokes fun at the naivety of the Barbies in Barbie Land at the beginning with the narrator and the Barbies saying "Barbie was created and fixed everything and all is good with the world!" and the Barbies truly believed Barbie made girls equal. Barbie Land is not meant to portray a real matriarchy. I think the movie clearly points out how absurd and innocent the matriarchy of Barbie Land is, and contrasts it with the absurd and cruel patriarchy of the "Real World."

The moment Barbie and Ken step into the Real World, I feel like the audience is shown what it is like to rapidly go from being an innocent young girl to being treated as an objectified woman in reality. Barbie goes from being happy, bubbly, and confident to experiencing "self-consciousness" for the first time.Β  Psychologists have explained that children are born with an innate positive sense of self, which is worn down by the actions and behaviors of adults. Once Barbie is out of Barbie Land, she is quickly subjected to the misogynistic realities of the patriarchal Real World. This scene reminds me of when women share their experiences of the first time they are objectified by society, mostly men, often at a disturbingly young age.

Barbie Gets Bullied
The Barbie movie does call out the issues surrounding Barbie dolls; unrealistic body and beauty standards, mass corporate profit, etc. in an amusing manner; Barbie enters the Real World confused, having thought "Barbie fixed everything" as the Barbies naively think is true in Barbie Land, only to be idealistically ripped apart in a monologue from the girl Barbie was played with as a child, who is now a teenager. I feel many woman can attest to the awkward and uncomfortable time in a woman's life when one goes from young girl to teenager, going through puberty, being viewed as a woman in a misogynistic culture. The teen girl is rightfully angry at the sickly-sweet naiveness of her childhood Barbie and all the negative repercussions that came from the development of Barbie dolls.

The Beauty in Being Human
There is an incredibly touching scene in the Barbie movie that deeply resonated with me. Barbie sits on a bench, and starts practicing mindfulness to understand what is going on in the confusing Real World. She begins fully observing people just beingβ€”couples quarreling, old friends laughing, a person looking distressed, another smiling. She takes in the complete and complex beauty of life. She then notices an old woman sitting on the other side of the bench, calmly reading a newspaper. We see the juxtaposition of a flamboyantly pink, youthful, and "perfect" Barbie, compared to a quaint elderly woman. This is Barbie's first interaction with an old woman, and I had no idea what to expect with the direction of this movie. It was a peak pivotal scene. Calm yet intense. I was worried the movie might do something like have Barbie shocked at an aged woman (Barbie earlier in the film was seen freaking out over her sudden development of cellulite). Instead, Barbie sincerely looks at this woman and says "you're beautiful." The woman's response locked in my feelings of gratitude that this movie was made. The old woman smiled and said "I know."

For so long, women have had beauty dangled in front of us in the form of unobtainable standards that we are expected to waste our mortal lives chasing, lest we worry of our fear of becoming "unwanted" or "irrelevant." And not only that, to even acknowledge our beauty is a cardinal sin, for then we are suddenly labeled vain and therefore hideous. Women are tricked into thinking beauty is products and cosmetic procedures bought with capital, or that beauty is a label that is given and taken away by others, and for a woman to not have this "beauty" is a death sentence. This elderly woman has lived so many years, she was beautiful for all of it, and she was confident in acknowledging her beauty. Not because of her external appearances, but because of her willingness to fully live her life for herself.

While the movie leans towards liberal feminist virtues, it was nice when they had a scene about "Depression Barbie," which included Barbie dolls who looked like they were not wearing makeup. I thought that was a nice touch. Another viewer commented about how Barbie slowly got less and less glamorous as the film went on, including a drop in her makeup. I feel like at Barbie's lowest point, her makeup was so minimal to the point of "no makeup" (of course there was still makeup, though) so I felt like that was nice. I wasn't expecting even a hint of "less than perfect external beauty" in the Barbie movie, so I appreciated that they dipped their feet in the water of women not always looking "all dolled up," pun intended.

The Pain in Being Woman
Near the turning point of the movie, a woman from the Real World explains to a defeated and depressed Barbie that yes, life can be cruel and unfair. The woman makes an impactful speech about how women are essentially expected to be "everything, but not too much." She explains all the contradictions women must spend their lives tearing themselves apart trying to strive towards. "Be this, but not that." I think her speech is an important message for many young women to hear, especially those who are getting sucked into gender ideology and think that the only way to escape a life of misogyny is by mutilating themselves and denying their physical reality by claiming to be male. The Real World woman makes this speech when Barbie is at her lowest, when Barbie feels the misogyny of the world is too much to handle, so Barbie can realize it's not hopeless and woman can always stand up, demand our rights, and make meaningful change. If you are a seasoned feminist, the speech is unlikely to be anything you haven't heard before, but I felt a deep resonation and gratitude that a big-budget pop-culture movie is blatantly calling out the chronic sexism that women deal with in the world.

Kenough is Kenough
There have been some critiques about how Ken has a lot of screentime. I honestly didn't mind the screentime Ken had, because Ken was similar to Barbie in that he had an innocent portrayal of the world as he understood it from being a part of Barbie Land. His worldview was then corrupted due to what he learned from the patriarchal Real World. Because Ken was originally created to be an accessory to Barbie, the Kens never even had the idea of living a life for themselves instead of always living to simply be noticed by Barbie.

The lack of self-esteem the Kens then tried to fill with patriarchy hurt them and the Barbies even worse than the initial dismissiveness the Barbies had for the Kens in Barbie Land's original matriarchy. The parts of the movie that focused on Ken basically showed how the development of patriarchal systems and men's immature attempts to control everything are ridiculous and detrimental to everyone. Ken's scenes were not to pride the societies that men created with their patriarchal systems, they were to mock the systems and sexism that men have perpetuated. The movie showed how men can easily fall into misogynistic rabbit holes like incel communities, right-wing politics, patriarchal communities, and so on, because they struggle with an inherently unstable sense of self worth.

The movie was also firm in that it was not Barbie's responsibility to bend to Ken's unrequited love, and instead stood strong in that Ken needed to choose to find and love himself. The problems that men have with their own lack of self-esteem and self-worth are men's to solve; not women's. We all need to have our own responsibility and accountability for ourselves.

That's My Barbie..?
I have some minor critiques with some of the liberal feminist cognitive dissonances I noticed in the movie. The liberal feminist nature of the movie that stuck out to me the most was the "inclusivity" of both the overweight Lawyer Barbie played by Sharon Rooney and the transgender-identifying-male (TIM) Doctor Barbie played by Hari Nef.

I think Sharon Rooney is a wonderful actress, but I feel like there is a dissonance at play here; Barbie was blatantly called out in this very movie for having unrealistic body standards, but I assume the studios thought it would be progressive to include an overweight actress as a Barbie. The Barbie toy line does not, and has not ever, created an overweight Barbie. But it seems including an overweight actress as a Barbie is great virtue signaling! I find it further amusing because there was a shot where the CEO of Mattel was visibly shocked and disturbed upon seeing Midge, Barbie's pregnant friend, but an overweight Barbie is treated just as if she was the same as any other Barbie. Midge was mocked and joked about as grotesque and scary just because she is pregnant, but this liberal feminist movie wouldn't dare call out how overweight women are disparaged by society. It feels strange and dismissive to me.

The TIM actor playing Doctor Barbie is blatantly insulting in a movie about what it means to be a girl growing into a woman in a patriarchal world. I feel disappointed that a role meant for a woman got taken by a man in the Barbie movie. Hari Nef and transgender ideology get no more attention from me in this post. If you are interested in reading more about the TIM "Barbie," check out this Ovarit thread discussing his role in the movie.

I'm willing to acknowledge these cognitive dissonances, because I realize nothing can be perfect. Perfect is the enemy of good.

What Was I Made For?
The first time we hear a piece of the song "What Was I Made For?" is when Barbie sits on a bench and observes life unfolding before her for the first time. This song is so meaningful and beautiful to me, I cry every time I hear it. In our societies, women are not born for themselves, women are made for others. Women are ripped of their humanity and torn away from their sense of self. We are told to be a woman is to be an amalgamation of all the roles that accommodate others, that is our purpose in life, and never to think or care for ourselves. We are not allowed to be human, we are forced to be women.

Quote:One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman.Β No biological, psychological, or economic destiny defines the figure that the human female acquires in society; it is civilization as a whole that develops this product, intermediate between female and eunuch, which one calls feminine. β€” Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex

The song "What Was I Made For?" hit me so hard. This song personally meant a lot to me, because less than a year ago, in my late twenties, I realized I had spent a vast majority of my life living for others and not for myself. The song perfectly captured the existential crisis and subsequent depression I felt when I realized I spent over a quarter of my life repressing my feelings and "going through the motions of life," living for others. Nine months ago, the "veil had lifted" on the emotional abuse and neglect my father put me through throughout my life, which likely played a major part in my depression and anxiety. A majority of my life was spent pleasing others and living in constant anxiety that I could never make everyone happy. I had a mental breakdown once I realized this and a complete existential crisis. I had to pull myself out of the deepest loniest depths of depression and suicidal ideations, and came out the other end realizing the beauty of truly livingβ€”living in the moment, in my body, for myself. Throughout the past nine months, I have been slowly rebuilding my life for myself, proud of myself, and loving myself. Hearing this song while seeing Barbie observe life and experience the awe of being human resonated deeply with me, as it echoed my own recent personal discoveries on how precious life is.

Choosing to Live
Sometimes, being a woman in this world feels utterly hopeless. And unlike Barbie, women don't have a choice on being women. That's what makes the ending for Barbie so impactful to me. Barbie accepted all the pain, fear, and tragedy within life, the realities of being a human, of being a woman. Barbie chose to live. Barbie acknowledges there is more meaning and worth in choosing to live her own mortal life than in remaining a plastic and lifeless doll controlled by others.

Barbie faces this dilemma of choosing to live twice within the movie. Both times she is offered a "happy ending," and "all" it requires her to do is get back in her box and remain a carefree doll for the rest of time. The first is when Mattel catches her, worried about Barbie's existential crisis wreaking havoc on the Real World. The second is after rejoicing once the Barbies won back matriarchal control over Barbie Land. But there is more to life than a happy ending.

Barbie's inventor, Ruth, informs Barbie one last time of what it means to become human. Ruth created Barbie as an inspiration for girls that women can be anything. Ruth realized that her own creation wanted the very thing all girls really want β€” to be human, to be free to feel, to live. Barbie chose the possibilities of life's uncertainty and finiteness over the eternal lifeless beauty of being an ideal, because Barbie understood it was more meaningful to be human than to be an object.

Now that's my Barbie! 🩷

Kozlik's regular member account. πŸ€πŸ
Clover
Kozlik's regular account πŸ€πŸ
Apr 13 2025, 11:09 PM #47

https://ovarit.com/o/Movies/431641/i-shamelessly-loved-barbie-2023

I shamelessly loved Barbie (2023)
Posted on Aug 3, 2023

Let me clarify some points before I continue with my thoughts and feelings on Barbie for the rest of my post. By virtue of us being members of Ovarit, we are likely more "well-versed" in notions of patriarchal systems and societal misogyny than the average woman or movie-goer. If you are going into this movie expecting to learn something new, you most likely won't; you likely already know much of what there is to know about feminism and patriarchy. I recommend tempering any expectations of the movie being a flawless feminist manifesto; despite being about what it means to be a woman in a patriarchal world, Barbie is also meant to be a fun summer blockbuster that needed to appeal to a wide audience. Nevertheless, I still greatly enjoyed this movie.

Weeks ago, I originally stated that I fully acknowledged the movie would be "a saccharine-sweet libfem fever dream," but it honestly was better than I expected. Of course, the movie still had stereotypical flaws that radfems can easily point outβ€”the women still primarily all wore makeup, the patriarchal systems in the movie were objectively worse than Barbie Land's matriarchy, and other "subtle" and "for granted" expectations that women are expected to do are featured in the movie and not addressed. However, despite some misogynistic expectations and some liberal feminist cognitive dissonances, the Barbie movie still hit me hard.

Overall, I feel like the Barbie movie guides the viewer through experiencing the daunting existential crisis that women face when they realize they exist within a misogynistic and patriarchal world.

And putting the feminist focus aside for a brief moment, I felt that Barbie was a great movie with lovingly crafted sets, dazzling dance choreography, densely packed humor and wit, beautiful heartfelt moments about understanding what it means to be human, and an original soundtrack with a diverse emotional palette.

Movie spoilers start below.



The Childlike Innocence of Barbie Land
Before Barbie, the primary dolls available to young girls were baby dolls, essentially suggesting to girls their only societally-approved pretend-play was to prepare them for becoming a mother and nothing more. Ruth, the creator of Barbie, created Barbie in an attempt to let girls know they are more than just "to-be mothers," girls and women can "be anything."

In "Barbie Land," everything is "perfect;" it is very much a bubblegum-pink, saccharine-sweet, childish perception of life. Barbie Land is quite literally depicted as a childlike and idealistic artificial land. Children are innocent and full of hope and possibilities; they do believe Barbie can be anything! That is why Barbie Land is so bubbly and hopeful, because it's a physical manifestation of bunch of little girls playing with dolls and pouring their happiness and wonder into a positive pretend world. The movie even pokes fun at the naivety of the Barbies in Barbie Land at the beginning with the narrator and the Barbies saying "Barbie was created and fixed everything and all is good with the world!" and the Barbies truly believed Barbie made girls equal. Barbie Land is not meant to portray a real matriarchy. I think the movie clearly points out how absurd and innocent the matriarchy of Barbie Land is, and contrasts it with the absurd and cruel patriarchy of the "Real World."

The moment Barbie and Ken step into the Real World, I feel like the audience is shown what it is like to rapidly go from being an innocent young girl to being treated as an objectified woman in reality. Barbie goes from being happy, bubbly, and confident to experiencing "self-consciousness" for the first time.Β  Psychologists have explained that children are born with an innate positive sense of self, which is worn down by the actions and behaviors of adults. Once Barbie is out of Barbie Land, she is quickly subjected to the misogynistic realities of the patriarchal Real World. This scene reminds me of when women share their experiences of the first time they are objectified by society, mostly men, often at a disturbingly young age.

Barbie Gets Bullied
The Barbie movie does call out the issues surrounding Barbie dolls; unrealistic body and beauty standards, mass corporate profit, etc. in an amusing manner; Barbie enters the Real World confused, having thought "Barbie fixed everything" as the Barbies naively think is true in Barbie Land, only to be idealistically ripped apart in a monologue from the girl Barbie was played with as a child, who is now a teenager. I feel many woman can attest to the awkward and uncomfortable time in a woman's life when one goes from young girl to teenager, going through puberty, being viewed as a woman in a misogynistic culture. The teen girl is rightfully angry at the sickly-sweet naiveness of her childhood Barbie and all the negative repercussions that came from the development of Barbie dolls.

The Beauty in Being Human
There is an incredibly touching scene in the Barbie movie that deeply resonated with me. Barbie sits on a bench, and starts practicing mindfulness to understand what is going on in the confusing Real World. She begins fully observing people just beingβ€”couples quarreling, old friends laughing, a person looking distressed, another smiling. She takes in the complete and complex beauty of life. She then notices an old woman sitting on the other side of the bench, calmly reading a newspaper. We see the juxtaposition of a flamboyantly pink, youthful, and "perfect" Barbie, compared to a quaint elderly woman. This is Barbie's first interaction with an old woman, and I had no idea what to expect with the direction of this movie. It was a peak pivotal scene. Calm yet intense. I was worried the movie might do something like have Barbie shocked at an aged woman (Barbie earlier in the film was seen freaking out over her sudden development of cellulite). Instead, Barbie sincerely looks at this woman and says "you're beautiful." The woman's response locked in my feelings of gratitude that this movie was made. The old woman smiled and said "I know."

For so long, women have had beauty dangled in front of us in the form of unobtainable standards that we are expected to waste our mortal lives chasing, lest we worry of our fear of becoming "unwanted" or "irrelevant." And not only that, to even acknowledge our beauty is a cardinal sin, for then we are suddenly labeled vain and therefore hideous. Women are tricked into thinking beauty is products and cosmetic procedures bought with capital, or that beauty is a label that is given and taken away by others, and for a woman to not have this "beauty" is a death sentence. This elderly woman has lived so many years, she was beautiful for all of it, and she was confident in acknowledging her beauty. Not because of her external appearances, but because of her willingness to fully live her life for herself.

While the movie leans towards liberal feminist virtues, it was nice when they had a scene about "Depression Barbie," which included Barbie dolls who looked like they were not wearing makeup. I thought that was a nice touch. Another viewer commented about how Barbie slowly got less and less glamorous as the film went on, including a drop in her makeup. I feel like at Barbie's lowest point, her makeup was so minimal to the point of "no makeup" (of course there was still makeup, though) so I felt like that was nice. I wasn't expecting even a hint of "less than perfect external beauty" in the Barbie movie, so I appreciated that they dipped their feet in the water of women not always looking "all dolled up," pun intended.

The Pain in Being Woman
Near the turning point of the movie, a woman from the Real World explains to a defeated and depressed Barbie that yes, life can be cruel and unfair. The woman makes an impactful speech about how women are essentially expected to be "everything, but not too much." She explains all the contradictions women must spend their lives tearing themselves apart trying to strive towards. "Be this, but not that." I think her speech is an important message for many young women to hear, especially those who are getting sucked into gender ideology and think that the only way to escape a life of misogyny is by mutilating themselves and denying their physical reality by claiming to be male. The Real World woman makes this speech when Barbie is at her lowest, when Barbie feels the misogyny of the world is too much to handle, so Barbie can realize it's not hopeless and woman can always stand up, demand our rights, and make meaningful change. If you are a seasoned feminist, the speech is unlikely to be anything you haven't heard before, but I felt a deep resonation and gratitude that a big-budget pop-culture movie is blatantly calling out the chronic sexism that women deal with in the world.

Kenough is Kenough
There have been some critiques about how Ken has a lot of screentime. I honestly didn't mind the screentime Ken had, because Ken was similar to Barbie in that he had an innocent portrayal of the world as he understood it from being a part of Barbie Land. His worldview was then corrupted due to what he learned from the patriarchal Real World. Because Ken was originally created to be an accessory to Barbie, the Kens never even had the idea of living a life for themselves instead of always living to simply be noticed by Barbie.

The lack of self-esteem the Kens then tried to fill with patriarchy hurt them and the Barbies even worse than the initial dismissiveness the Barbies had for the Kens in Barbie Land's original matriarchy. The parts of the movie that focused on Ken basically showed how the development of patriarchal systems and men's immature attempts to control everything are ridiculous and detrimental to everyone. Ken's scenes were not to pride the societies that men created with their patriarchal systems, they were to mock the systems and sexism that men have perpetuated. The movie showed how men can easily fall into misogynistic rabbit holes like incel communities, right-wing politics, patriarchal communities, and so on, because they struggle with an inherently unstable sense of self worth.

The movie was also firm in that it was not Barbie's responsibility to bend to Ken's unrequited love, and instead stood strong in that Ken needed to choose to find and love himself. The problems that men have with their own lack of self-esteem and self-worth are men's to solve; not women's. We all need to have our own responsibility and accountability for ourselves.

That's My Barbie..?
I have some minor critiques with some of the liberal feminist cognitive dissonances I noticed in the movie. The liberal feminist nature of the movie that stuck out to me the most was the "inclusivity" of both the overweight Lawyer Barbie played by Sharon Rooney and the transgender-identifying-male (TIM) Doctor Barbie played by Hari Nef.

I think Sharon Rooney is a wonderful actress, but I feel like there is a dissonance at play here; Barbie was blatantly called out in this very movie for having unrealistic body standards, but I assume the studios thought it would be progressive to include an overweight actress as a Barbie. The Barbie toy line does not, and has not ever, created an overweight Barbie. But it seems including an overweight actress as a Barbie is great virtue signaling! I find it further amusing because there was a shot where the CEO of Mattel was visibly shocked and disturbed upon seeing Midge, Barbie's pregnant friend, but an overweight Barbie is treated just as if she was the same as any other Barbie. Midge was mocked and joked about as grotesque and scary just because she is pregnant, but this liberal feminist movie wouldn't dare call out how overweight women are disparaged by society. It feels strange and dismissive to me.

The TIM actor playing Doctor Barbie is blatantly insulting in a movie about what it means to be a girl growing into a woman in a patriarchal world. I feel disappointed that a role meant for a woman got taken by a man in the Barbie movie. Hari Nef and transgender ideology get no more attention from me in this post. If you are interested in reading more about the TIM "Barbie," check out this Ovarit thread discussing his role in the movie.

I'm willing to acknowledge these cognitive dissonances, because I realize nothing can be perfect. Perfect is the enemy of good.

What Was I Made For?
The first time we hear a piece of the song "What Was I Made For?" is when Barbie sits on a bench and observes life unfolding before her for the first time. This song is so meaningful and beautiful to me, I cry every time I hear it. In our societies, women are not born for themselves, women are made for others. Women are ripped of their humanity and torn away from their sense of self. We are told to be a woman is to be an amalgamation of all the roles that accommodate others, that is our purpose in life, and never to think or care for ourselves. We are not allowed to be human, we are forced to be women.

Quote:One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman.Β No biological, psychological, or economic destiny defines the figure that the human female acquires in society; it is civilization as a whole that develops this product, intermediate between female and eunuch, which one calls feminine. β€” Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex

The song "What Was I Made For?" hit me so hard. This song personally meant a lot to me, because less than a year ago, in my late twenties, I realized I had spent a vast majority of my life living for others and not for myself. The song perfectly captured the existential crisis and subsequent depression I felt when I realized I spent over a quarter of my life repressing my feelings and "going through the motions of life," living for others. Nine months ago, the "veil had lifted" on the emotional abuse and neglect my father put me through throughout my life, which likely played a major part in my depression and anxiety. A majority of my life was spent pleasing others and living in constant anxiety that I could never make everyone happy. I had a mental breakdown once I realized this and a complete existential crisis. I had to pull myself out of the deepest loniest depths of depression and suicidal ideations, and came out the other end realizing the beauty of truly livingβ€”living in the moment, in my body, for myself. Throughout the past nine months, I have been slowly rebuilding my life for myself, proud of myself, and loving myself. Hearing this song while seeing Barbie observe life and experience the awe of being human resonated deeply with me, as it echoed my own recent personal discoveries on how precious life is.

Choosing to Live
Sometimes, being a woman in this world feels utterly hopeless. And unlike Barbie, women don't have a choice on being women. That's what makes the ending for Barbie so impactful to me. Barbie accepted all the pain, fear, and tragedy within life, the realities of being a human, of being a woman. Barbie chose to live. Barbie acknowledges there is more meaning and worth in choosing to live her own mortal life than in remaining a plastic and lifeless doll controlled by others.

Barbie faces this dilemma of choosing to live twice within the movie. Both times she is offered a "happy ending," and "all" it requires her to do is get back in her box and remain a carefree doll for the rest of time. The first is when Mattel catches her, worried about Barbie's existential crisis wreaking havoc on the Real World. The second is after rejoicing once the Barbies won back matriarchal control over Barbie Land. But there is more to life than a happy ending.

Barbie's inventor, Ruth, informs Barbie one last time of what it means to become human. Ruth created Barbie as an inspiration for girls that women can be anything. Ruth realized that her own creation wanted the very thing all girls really want β€” to be human, to be free to feel, to live. Barbie chose the possibilities of life's uncertainty and finiteness over the eternal lifeless beauty of being an ideal, because Barbie understood it was more meaningful to be human than to be an object.

Now that's my Barbie! 🩷


Kozlik's regular member account. πŸ€πŸ

Clover
Kozlik's regular account πŸ€πŸ
902
Apr 13 2025, 11:10 PM
#48
https://ovarit.com/o/GenderCritical/414481/if-you-could-clarify-one-thing-about-being-gender-critical-what-would-it-be

If you could clarify one thing about being gender critical, what would it be?
Posted on Jul 12, 2023

Pretend you have the ability to let everyone in the world notice a notion about your views on being gender critical: what would it be? Imagine they'd see your thought on a sticker, or a poster, or a sign, or hear it on the radio, or hear someone say it, while they go about their day. They are not guaranteed to agree with you, they simply notice your thought and can think about it more if they so choose.

What would you want a person to know?

Try to keep it within a few sentences, and feel free to elaborate on your point afterwards!



I posted a similar question yesterday on the topic of radical feminism, feel free to check out those responses and add your own there too!

Kozlik's regular member account. πŸ€πŸ
Clover
Kozlik's regular account πŸ€πŸ
Apr 13 2025, 11:10 PM #48

https://ovarit.com/o/GenderCritical/414481/if-you-could-clarify-one-thing-about-being-gender-critical-what-would-it-be

If you could clarify one thing about being gender critical, what would it be?
Posted on Jul 12, 2023

Pretend you have the ability to let everyone in the world notice a notion about your views on being gender critical: what would it be? Imagine they'd see your thought on a sticker, or a poster, or a sign, or hear it on the radio, or hear someone say it, while they go about their day. They are not guaranteed to agree with you, they simply notice your thought and can think about it more if they so choose.

What would you want a person to know?

Try to keep it within a few sentences, and feel free to elaborate on your point afterwards!



I posted a similar question yesterday on the topic of radical feminism, feel free to check out those responses and add your own there too!


Kozlik's regular member account. πŸ€πŸ

Clover
Kozlik's regular account πŸ€πŸ
902
Apr 13 2025, 11:11 PM
#49
https://ovarit.com/o/WomensLiberation/413623/if-you-could-clarify-one-thing-about-radical-feminism-what-would-it-be

If you could clarify one thing about radical feminism, what would it be?
Posted on Jul 11, 2023

Pretend you have the ability to let everyone in the world notice a notion about your view on radical feminism: what would it be? Imagine they'd see your thought on a sticker, or a poster, or a sign, or hear it on the radio, or hear someone say it, while they go about their day. They are not guaranteed to agree with you, they simply notice your thought and can think about it more if they so choose.

What would you want a person to know?

Try to keep it within a few sentences, and feel free to elaborate on your point afterwards!

Kozlik's regular member account. πŸ€πŸ
Clover
Kozlik's regular account πŸ€πŸ
Apr 13 2025, 11:11 PM #49

https://ovarit.com/o/WomensLiberation/413623/if-you-could-clarify-one-thing-about-radical-feminism-what-would-it-be

If you could clarify one thing about radical feminism, what would it be?
Posted on Jul 11, 2023

Pretend you have the ability to let everyone in the world notice a notion about your view on radical feminism: what would it be? Imagine they'd see your thought on a sticker, or a poster, or a sign, or hear it on the radio, or hear someone say it, while they go about their day. They are not guaranteed to agree with you, they simply notice your thought and can think about it more if they so choose.

What would you want a person to know?

Try to keep it within a few sentences, and feel free to elaborate on your point afterwards!


Kozlik's regular member account. πŸ€πŸ

Clover
Kozlik's regular account πŸ€πŸ
902
Apr 13 2025, 11:12 PM
#50
https://ovarit.com/o/Activism/34521/free-gender-critical-and-radical-feminist-ovarit-stickers-usa

Free gender critical and radical feminist Ovarit stickers [USA]
Posted on Jun 20, 2021

Update: All stickers have been claimed and sent out! Thank you for the interest. :)

Hello! A few months ago, I got into making and placing stickers that have either gender critical or radical feminist phrases on them, along with a we are OVARIT.COM phrase at the bottom.

I've been placing these around my local area, but I figure it would be cool to see these in places all over the United States.

Note: I am not officially involved with Ovarit, I'm just trying to spread the word about the website. Please use caution when sharing your personal information with anyone, and if you'd like a sticker but are worried about sharing real name for the mailing address, I can put down a nickname or username for the recipient of the mail!

I have a lot from my first batch/attempt at making these stickers. The stickers are 2" x 4", slightly too wide to fit in one side of a wallet unfortunately, but it was what I had at the time. Additionally, there is some smudging on some of them, because I didn't configure my printer properly at that time. Here are the stickers and the six phrases I have available: https://i.imgur.com/oKjnUID.jpeg

I have nineteen zero stickers! You can request as many as you'd like. I will put them in an envelope and mail them to you. :) If you request multiple, I will do my best to ensure they are not all smudgy ones.

Here are the phrases and counts:

  • Women are people. Female is not a feeling. x4 x0

  • Biology isn't bigotry. Men cannot be women. x4 x0

  • Money does not equal consent. Sex is not a human right. Women are not products. x4 x0

  • Stop female erasure. Protect women's spaces. x3 x0

  • Porn is abuse of women. Women are not products. x2 x0

  • Sex is binary. Female is not a feeling. x2 x0


Kozlik's regular member account. πŸ€πŸ
Clover
Kozlik's regular account πŸ€πŸ
Apr 13 2025, 11:12 PM #50

https://ovarit.com/o/Activism/34521/free-gender-critical-and-radical-feminist-ovarit-stickers-usa

Free gender critical and radical feminist Ovarit stickers [USA]
Posted on Jun 20, 2021

Update: All stickers have been claimed and sent out! Thank you for the interest. :)

Hello! A few months ago, I got into making and placing stickers that have either gender critical or radical feminist phrases on them, along with a we are OVARIT.COM phrase at the bottom.

I've been placing these around my local area, but I figure it would be cool to see these in places all over the United States.

Note: I am not officially involved with Ovarit, I'm just trying to spread the word about the website. Please use caution when sharing your personal information with anyone, and if you'd like a sticker but are worried about sharing real name for the mailing address, I can put down a nickname or username for the recipient of the mail!

I have a lot from my first batch/attempt at making these stickers. The stickers are 2" x 4", slightly too wide to fit in one side of a wallet unfortunately, but it was what I had at the time. Additionally, there is some smudging on some of them, because I didn't configure my printer properly at that time. Here are the stickers and the six phrases I have available: https://i.imgur.com/oKjnUID.jpeg

I have nineteen zero stickers! You can request as many as you'd like. I will put them in an envelope and mail them to you. :) If you request multiple, I will do my best to ensure they are not all smudgy ones.

Here are the phrases and counts:

  • Women are people. Female is not a feeling. x4 x0

  • Biology isn't bigotry. Men cannot be women. x4 x0

  • Money does not equal consent. Sex is not a human right. Women are not products. x4 x0

  • Stop female erasure. Protect women's spaces. x3 x0

  • Porn is abuse of women. Women are not products. x2 x0

  • Sex is binary. Female is not a feeling. x2 x0


Kozlik's regular member account. πŸ€πŸ

Pages (6): Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Recently Browsing
 2 Guest(s)
Recently Browsing
 2 Guest(s)